9-9-9 and the 30% Dead Weight (Part 2 of 2)

By Tera Ertz

In the administration end of a business, you have multiple categories, but we’re going to focus on two.  On the one hand you have employees who handle the day to day necessities of running the business as well as setting the overall goals and direction of the company.  This includes management, CEOs, HR, AR, AP and anyone not directly engaged in producing the products for the company.  These employees serve vital functions in keeping the company growing, and while they can often be trimmed, the need for quality personnel again limits options for reducing costs that set pricing.  The other side of this is the cost of complying with the myriad regulations and taxes imposed by governments at all levels.  These regulations and taxes require the hiring of a number of personnel and the funding of billions of man hours over the whole economy that have nothing to do with the actual production of the goods we pay for when we go to the store.  While there is some need in any civilized society to regulate and to tax, over the course of decades of manipulation of the tax code the cost of this burden has expanded exponentially as carve outs, loop holes, lobbying costs etc. have drowned business in a sea of red tape.  This increase in cost of goods that has nothing to do with actually producing the goods has driven prices up in tandem with every new tax, guideline or threatened regulation.  And the taxes themselves are also embedded in the prices, because, after all, they are part of the cost of producing those goods.

I was reading an interesting article by Art Laffer earlier this week that explains some of the problems created by our current tax structure inside our free market.  He notes that economist estimate that for every dollar paid in taxes, companies pay an additional $.30 to comply with the tax laws.  So, given the cost of goods scenario above, this essentially means that you, the consumer are paying $1.30 for every $1 of taxes the government collects on the products and services you buy.  To give an example, if you wanted to purchase a television and it cost you $1000, the price would break down kind of like this.  The profit to the company that made the TV would likely be about 10% or $100 dollars.  The cost of the materials would likely run about 30%, or $300.  The cost of the direct labor involved would probably be about 30% as well.  The cost of company related administration, infrastructure, research, etc.  would likely be about 2-3% (most companies have multiple products, so this cost per product is usually pretty low)  or $20.  So far, the price of the TV would be about $720.  On average, embedded federal taxes make up about 22% of the cost for a whopping $220 take by the government.  And then, the compliance cost adds an additional $66, which brings our total up to $1006, before state sales tax.  Let’s try that in a table.

Money Paid to Other Companies (Raw materials) $300
Money Paid to Direct Labor $300
Money Paid to Indirect Labor (Business Administration) $20
Money Paid to Investors (Profit) $100
Money Paid to Government $220
Money Paid to Comply with Government $66

(Note the government’s take on this is more than double the company’s profit, and this does not include the additional tax of an average 20% or $64 on labor and 15% or $15 dollars on dividends that the government receives from your purchase)

Under the 9-9-9 tax plan, the compliance cost for the tax burden would be greatly reduced.  The embedded taxes in products would also be reduced from their current $220 to $90.  As I noted in yesterdays article, the price of goods is regulated by two basic economic principles in a free market.  The first is what people are willing to pay for a product.  The second is competition in the market.  These two principles combine to benefits everyone, but especially the poor and those on fixed incomes when it comes to the 9-9-9 plan.  Natural competition, shoppers looking for a better deal, and a desire on the company’s part to sell more products come together to reduce the price for you the consumer, in this case, even if some compliance costs still exist, your $1000 TV would likely cost about $850 before the national sales tax.  And $926 once that tax was added on.  In other words, in addition to depriving politicians of the ability to use your tax dollars to maintain their positions, 9-9-9 will save everyone money, including the poor.

For more of Mr. Laffer’s great insights click here.

To read more from Tera Ertz, check out The Pursuit of Happiness Show or become her friend on Facebook.



About sswimp

I am not an "African-American'. I am a proud American, who happens to be of African descent. I am Christian. My personal relationship with Jesus Christ and the Word of God shapes my concepts of what it means to be a conservative. I am Pro Life. Devoted to the principles of free enterprise, limited government,and individual responsibility. I believe in the sanctity of marriage between a man and woman.
This entry was posted in Capitalism, Election News, Free Enterprise and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to 9-9-9 and the 30% Dead Weight (Part 2 of 2)

  1. Lilian says:

    This has made my day. I wish all postnigs were this good.

  2. terajean says:

    Thank you, I’m glad you enjoyed it.

  3. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains. If you know of any please share. Thank you!

  4. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on several websites for about a year and am worried about switching to another platform. I have heard good things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  5. I was curious if you ever thought of changing the layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out better?

  6. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  7. Interesting…not really fully certain that I comprehend everything but appreciate your spending some time to elucidate that in such detail. I got an malfunction message when I attempted to subscribe to your Rss feed though. Anyone else here possessing this problem?

  8. Duffy says:

    Greetings from Germany, great job!

  9. Lia Walp says:

    When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks!

  10. Lan Lepetich says:

    I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  11. Herb Kincaid says:

    very well read and a nice topic.

  12. Dean Vales says:

    You could not enter into great depth, however you presented the necessities I desired to get help me thru. Was I ever really surprised to locate your blog. Please continue on your quest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s